Fake Biden Regime Bringing War to American Soil, One We Cannot Win - The Timing of the 'Automatic' Military Registration in the NDAA Stinks as Our U.S. Military Has Been Weakened With 'Woke' Policies
DEMONCRATS MORE WORRIED ABOUT 'WOKE' ISSUES THAN MILITARY READINESS
By Susan Duclos
June 23, 2024
With the news that the House of Representatives passed theĀ National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which will automatically registerĀ men aged 18 to 26 for selective service, and a proposal to also include women that registration.
Registering is mandatory already, but was not automatically done previously, and the timing of this stinks to high heaven.
Below we will also be discussing the main concern of Demoncrats, who are in control for the Senate, and no real surprise there that the biggest concerns for them in the House version of the bill, which "U.S. governmentās military and national security priorities over the next fiscal year," has nothing to do with national security priorities.
The last NDAA that passed the U.S. Senate in July 2023, described the bill in the following manner
It is important to remember that description as later in this piece we'll discuss what parts of the House version that has DemocratĀ Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, whining.
There is a lot to unpack here, so let us begin with the timing since the Biden regime seems to be doing everything in their power to drag American military members into a never-ending war with other nuclear powers.
The Biden regime is now allowing Ukraine to use U.S. weaponry to strike inside of Russia. Russia has already acknowledged that the U.S. are Russia are in an "indirect" war. Putin is also threatening a tit-for-tatthreatening a tit-for-tat by saying he can arm U.S. adversaries, as we are arming Ukraine.
Imagine Russia giving a non-nuclear country that despises the U.S. weaponry, including nuclear weapons with the sole purpose of attacking America.Ā
The Biden regime should have minded their own business rather than using Ukraine as a proxy in our war against Russia.
A WAR THE U.S. CANNOT WIN....
By the end of 2023, the U.S. military had missed it recruiting goal by approximately 41,000 military personnel across all branches.Ā
According to the NDAA signed into law last year, the U.S. military recruitment goals were reduced to "1,284,500 personnel, representing the lowest number of service members since before World War II," according to American Military News.
That number represented anĀ 8.4% or 40,000 decrease in soldiers over the past three years for the U.S. Army, aĀ decrease of 10,000 sailors, marking a 3% reduction for the U.S. Navy,Ā Ā a decrease of 13,475 airmen, representing a 4% reduction for the U.S. Air Force andĀ Ā a decrease of 8,900 active-duty members, marking almost a 5% reduction over the past three years, for the U.S. Marine Corps.
With nearly half of 2024 over, the military is seeing a shortfall to recruitmentmilitary is seeing a shortfall to recruitment, despite all the the decreased recruitment goals for 2024.
In February 2024, Pew Research offered a glimpse into why these recruitment goals aren't being met.
Most Americans continue to express positive views of the military: 60% say it has a positive effect, while 36% say its effect is negative.
ā¢Ā Adults under 30 are the only age group in which a larger share says the military has a negative (53%) than positive (43%) impact.
ā¢Ā Liberal Democrats are roughly evenly divided (50% positive to 49% negative).
A look at American colleges, and the increasing number of liberal socialist or communist professors teaching our nation's students, says a lot about why adults under 30 and liberal democrats have smaller numbers in positivity in regards to the U.S. Military.
Another factor showing why the U.S. is woefully unprepared for any direct involvement in a war, especially a boots on the ground war, or one brought to us, right here on U.S. soil, is the lowering of physical and intellectual standards, both in 2022, and again in 2023.
March 2022:Ā Army approves reduced physical fitness standards for women, older soldiers
Army approves reduced physical fitness standards for women, older soldiers
August 2023::Ā Pentagon lowering recruitment standards again: Report
The announcement of the Pentagonās plan was made recently by three defense officials to Military.com. The proposed change would represent a significant shift in the way applicants are tested academically to determine a potential recruitās eligibility for jobs in the U.S. military.
The proposed change in the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) is expected to help mitigate the military recruitment shortage partially believed to be caused by many Americans not scoring high enough on the test to qualify for enlistment in the U.S. military.Ā
February 2024:Ā US Army is slashing 24,000 jobs - 5% of its force - - equivalent to five percent of its forces - in a move it claims will help prepare the nation for the next major war.Ā
If women or older men and women cannot pass the same physical fitness standards that men can, they have no place in the military. There are actual women, REAL woman as opposed to men pretending to be women, that can pass those physical fitness tests, but they are few and far between.
To the same point, intellectual test scores should never be lowered, because a soldier must be able to think, particularly when under pressure.
DEMONCRATS MORE WORRIED ABOUT 'WOKE' ISSUES THAN MILITARY READINESSā¦.
In the NDAA passed by the U.S. House of Representatives, there are amendments "curbing funding for abortion, transgender medical care, and diversity efforts."
Despite not one of the issues having anything to do with military readiness, the DemocratĀ Senate Majority Leader, Chuck Schumer, is whining about those amendments and wants them removed.
So, yet another factor weakening military readiness to the point of almost being non-existent, as not one of those issues belong in a military funding bill.
Transgender?
Diversity?
As to choice, Schumer is speaking about abortion, but the "choice" is always there. They can "choose" to keep their legs closed. They can "choose" to use protection. They can "choose" to focus on their military assignments rather than look for their next lay.
Women have always had that choice, and barring rape, it has never legally been taken away from them.
Schumer is too worried about being "woke" than he is in America's ability to fight and win a war, especially one on U.S. soil.
Flashback:
READ MORE:
Share or comment on this article.
Your support is crucial in exposing fake news and in helping us defeat mass censorship.
In the animal kingdom, and at my house, total unemotional submission is represented by submitting to anal penetration. We don't go there, but the 'wokes' consider it part of the job. I was approached for sex from a homosexual several times, and each time I was back-stabbed for refusing. I guess I should make a threat next time.