Discussion about this post

User's avatar
MattB's avatar

Interesting that the paper focuses solely on sulforaphane, which is an NrF2 activator & powerful phytochemical but one of more than 100 such compounds that work synergistically to help sythesize enzymes including superoxide dismutase (SOD) in the liver that destroy free radicals & reduce oxidative stress. Studying compounds in isolation misses the synergistic effect of how they work in a healthy immune system.

Quercetin is another important antioxidant (found in apples and onions). It is also an ionophore that helps facilitate the movement of zinc across the cell membrane to help protect against viral infection (https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jf5014633). NrF2 activators are not only best taken together, they are more effective when in the presence of compounds that enhance bioavailability. For example turmeric is best taken with piperines (pepper compounds) and an oil like olive oil to enhance bioavailabililty.

I also question the wisdom of using remdisivir in the study which according to the authors "interacted synergistically to inhibit coronavirus infection in vitro" for two reasons: 1) it is very expensive and 2) has been shown to cause kidney damage in a number of studies. Unfortunately, an in-vitro studies like the one discussed, doesn't measure the impact on our kidneys or other organ systems. So why study remdesivir when there are so many superior, less expensive and safer naturally-produced antioxidants to examine? The answer is unfortunately all too obvious. These antioxidants are inexpensive for the most part not-patented which is certainly not the case with "rundeathisnear."

There are now thousands of papers available at pubmed.gov discussing NrF2 activators in the treatment of a host of diseases from cancers to diabetes. When I first began researching this topic in 2010, there were just a dozen.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=NrF2+activators

Expand full comment

No posts