350 Comments
User's avatar
Paula Ferguson's avatar

When is Obama going to be arrested?

Expand full comment
Constance's avatar

Exactly

Expand full comment
Cheryl p Dias's avatar

My question exactly much of his history and past is just weirdly clandestine

Expand full comment
Trina Payan's avatar

The real Obama is gone. Why doesn’t anyone know this??

Expand full comment
Lidia Pousada's avatar

Huh? The real Obama is gone? Please clarify.

Expand full comment
Trina Payan's avatar

Easy research

Expand full comment
Lidia Pousada's avatar

Not at all. Obama has no clandestine history. And he’s the same man he’s always been. Is this another conspiracy theory?

Expand full comment
Trina Payan's avatar

Bullshit!! His own mother worked for the CIA! He belongs to a deep state family and everyone but you knows he was born in Kenya!

Expand full comment
Lidia Pousada's avatar

What does Judge Boasberg’s mother have to do with his ruling on the rights of immigrants to have due process??

Are you claiming that Boasberg was born in Kenya? Or is this the same baloney story that Obama was born in Kenya?

Obama’s American birth certificate was made public almost 20 years ago. He was born in Hawaii. Look it up.

Expand full comment
Trina Payan's avatar

You’ve done zero research! Obama and Big Mike were executed at Gitmo! Too bad you don’t know how to research

Expand full comment
Lidia Pousada's avatar

I don’t believe crazy conspiracy theories, which seems to be where you’ve done your “easy” research.

The reason no one knows about Obama’s death is because Obama is alive and well. I have no idea why you think he’s dead.

I don’t know who Big Mike is so I can’t clarify his life or death.

Expand full comment
Constance's avatar

He sure acted the same arrogant, bossy thug today as he lectured. He just rides on planes across the country!

Expand full comment
Cindy Tubbs's avatar

Fake!

Expand full comment
Constance's avatar

Yes, he is a total fake. Community organizer!

Obama gave Pearson Publishing Company $350 million taxpayer’s money to create common core text. Failure. Pearson gave obama $65 million for a book deal. Taxpayers own his mansions.

Expand full comment
Cochise's avatar

Tell it Constance 😀

Expand full comment
Lidia Pousada's avatar

You may be the only person in the world who’s ever described the very academic, professorial, and polite Obama as a thug.

Expand full comment
Connie Parker's avatar

He's a thug

Expand full comment
Constance's avatar

Nope. See this often

Expand full comment
TheRepublicIsDead's avatar

Where did the real Obama go?

Expand full comment
Trina Payan's avatar

Gitmo’d a while ago with Big Mike.. Executed . … You’re watching a movie . Can’t you tell it’s a clone? Actually probably a face mask by now. Why don’t you guys all know this by now lol

Expand full comment
Trina Payan's avatar

Gitmo’d he had his tribunal

Expand full comment
Stephen Carter's avatar

Likely never.

Expand full comment
JAD (TNChristianPatriot)'s avatar

According to Real Raw News a few years ago, Obama was executed whimpering for using a satellite phone in Gitmo.

Expand full comment
Lidia Pousada's avatar

It’s satire, but it appears that satire, like sarcasm, is often misunderstood online. Too many people interpret satire as the truth.

Expand full comment
Trina Payan's avatar

RRN is not satire! It’s tied to the Q movement! There’s lots of doubles out there, including Obama and Big Mike. Killery is gone too and has a clone now. You are watching a movie! It’s too wake up the sheep. To bad you’re so blind

Expand full comment
Lidia Pousada's avatar

Do you realize that your statements are crazy?

The Q movement was created by Mike Flynn. It’s a hoax.

Hillary is NOT dead — she lives in my town. I see her walking around.

There’s no such thing as human clones — that’s strictly science fiction.

I’m neither blind nor stupid. You, however, are both gullible and paranoid. As a physician, I suggest you consider seeing a therapist about your paranoia.

Expand full comment
slaicker1's avatar

It’s a great thought but unverified that the military has indeed arrested this pos judge. He definitely needs to be tho🤔

Expand full comment
Lidia Pousada's avatar

The military did not and will not arrest Judge Boasberg because he hasn’t broken any laws.

He has simply ruled that the Trump admin must FOLLOW the law.

You can’t arrest a judge because you don’t like his ruling. The USA is NOT a military dictatorship where that kind of abuse is tolerated. We are a nation ruled by laws.

If you don’t like a judge’s ruling, you can APPEAL it to a higher court. That’s our legal system.

Expand full comment
TheRepublicIsDead's avatar

The law was followed. Judges need to stop being dictators.

Expand full comment
Lidia Pousada's avatar

The judiciary’s job is to interpret the laws that Congress creates and the president enacts. The president can neither create nor interpret our laws.

In this case, Judge Boasberg ruled that the Trump admin did NOT follow our laws when it ignored the fundamental principle that every person is entitled to present their case in court, which is the definition of due process.

The word “person” is stated twice in our Constitution with regard to due process because it doesn’t matter if you’re a citizen, a tourist, a permanent resident, or an illegal immigrant — ALL persons are entitled to due process in the USA.

So, no — the Trump admin did NOT follow our laws when it ignored due process.

Boasberg is NOT being a dictator. He’s doing his job by stopping the executive branch from breaking our laws.

Expand full comment
TheRepublicIsDead's avatar

Illegals have no legal standing once they are determined to be here illegally. The border patrol can make such a determination at the border by using common sense stuff such as; no speaky inglés, no passport, no state ID, no cell phone with a US number.

By your standard we shouldn't have any border check-points. We just figure that shit out later.

Expand full comment
Lidia Pousada's avatar

If someone is caught in the very act of crossing the border, they are subject to immediate turnback. There’s a legal mechanism to do that. No one has to “figure that shit out later.”

But once someone is dwelling here illegally, they must be arrested and brought before an immigration judge who hears their case. These aren’t jury trials and they rarely take more than an hour.

The judge hears the immigrant’s testimony, determines if criteria for granting asylum are met, and decides if deportation is appropriate.

I’m not in favor of open borders nor has the US ever had a completely open border at any time in the past century. The US routinely deports millions of people yearly. Obama and Biden both deported more people than Trump has.

So why is Trump having so much trouble deporting people? Because he’s deliberately breaking the law.

Trump has authorized ICE to do public raids on immigrants already living in the US. They wear full masks so they can’t be identified when they break the law by grabbing people who “look like” illegal immigrants but may not be.

Why isn’t Trump just following the same rules Obama and Biden used? If more personnel are needed, Trump can easily hire them.

He’s not doing that because he’s trying to establish that he can ignore due process because he’s the president. He is acting in complete defiance of the Constitution. His hope was that Congress and the judiciary would allow him to break the law.

So far, the GOP-controlled Congress hasn’t stopped anything Trump has done, even when it’s clearly unconstitutional, like eliminating or defunding federal departments. Only Congress can create, fund, or eliminate departments, according to the Constitution.

But the judiciary hasn’t let Trump break the law. They’ve called him on ignoring the due process our Constitution stipulates for every person in America. They’ve stopped him.

Why? Because the judges are radical leftists who hate Trump??

No. Judges are appointed by both Republican and Democratic presidents. The judges who’ve stopped Trump include liberals and conservatives. This isn’t about party affiliation.

It’s about protecting the fundamental right of every person in America to have their say in court and to be innocent until proven guilty.

If our judges allow Trump to deport people without proof that they’re here illegally, they will have gone against our Constitution and given him the ability to deport citizens as well as illegal immigrants.

If our judges allow Trump to throw people into foreign prisons without a trial convicting them of a crime, they will have given him the ability to throw his political opponents into foreign prisons.

They will have given Trump the powets of a monarch or a dictator.

And that is what no judge, Republican or Democrat, will do.

Expand full comment
Lidia Pousada's avatar

For what? This story is completely fabricated. If it weren’t, this would be front page news, not an isolated post.

Expand full comment
The Liberator's avatar

Correct. Real Raw News is actually Real Fake News. The question is, to what end?

Expand full comment
Mike Stevens's avatar

After Cheney

Bush

Clinton

And many more...

Which means never

They are a Uni-party.

Expand full comment
Lidia Pousada's avatar

I’ll respond point by point. Trump isn’t enforcing any laws that weren’t already being enforced at the border. And he’s breaking many laws with his ICE raids away from the border.

He certainly hates immigrants but he doesn’t really want to deport them all. He needs them as scapegoats. Who else can he falsely blame for wage stagnation and crime?

He needs to depict immigrants as enemies of America in order to gin up his base. Illegal immigrants are a small minority with little to no access to legal aid. They can’t fight back. They’re ideal scapegoats.

Illegal immigration increases in desperate times like the pandemic. It’s cyclic and it’s happened many times before. The post-pandemic surge in immigration occurred because people were fleeing terrible political and economic conditions in their native countries.

No one walks thousands of miles and gives all their money to coyotes unless they’re desperate for work and peace.

The vast majority of immigrants don’t get endless court hearings and judicial stays. Some cases are complicated but they’re in the minority.

If Biden had Alzheimer’s for his entire term, I would wish every president had the same. Biden passed more impactful legislation than any president since FDR and LBJ. He was a master administrator.

He got us through the pandemic with the strongest economy in the world. He wrestled inflation down from >9% to 2.4%. He’s the first president in decades to actually repair and rebuild our infrastructure. He increased medical coverage for millions of Americans. No demented person could accomplish what he did.

Speaking of demented, Trump is aging rapidly. He often makes little sense and his language fluency has dropped dramatically since his first term. He seems unaware of important events and repeatedly responds “I don’t know” to simple questions. He’s the oldest president ever elected. Doesn’t that worry you?

It’s common knowledge among economists as well as business owners that illegal immigrants provide 25-50% of labor in construction, agriculture, and the service industry. This is not news. Look it up.

Illegals don’t suppress wages — they take menial jobs Americans won’t do. The GOP suppresses wages by refusing to increase minimum wage.

Illegal immigrants don’t increase rents either. They live crowded together in the lowest income housing possible.

Illegals do NOT consume more in taxes than they put in. They pay taxes via automatic payroll deductions, sales tax, and property taxes. Roughly 40% pay income tax voluntarily both to avoid penalties and to work towards citizenship.

Illegal immigrants get NOTHING in return for taxes. Contrary to MAGA hysteria, they get NO federal benefits other than emergency medical care. They pay into Social Security but get nothing back unless they become citizens.

That’s federal law. The only exceptions to that are small pilot programs run by cities or states.

Illegal immigrants don’t avoid reporting crime — they avoid committing crime. Getting arrested is the last thing an illegal immigrant wants. This has been true for decades.

Biden’s program flew in immigrants who had applied for asylum from outside the country and had been granted it. They were vetted before arriving. NONE of them entered illegally.

The purpose of that program was to screen immigrants in advance as well as decrease the backlog at ports of entry. It was an intelligent solution for both asylum seekers and our crowded border posts.

Expand full comment
Melanie Pflasterer's avatar

That's what I want to know!!! ARREST AND PROSECUTE OBAMA FOR TREASON ALSO!!

Expand full comment
Senior K's avatar

It's posts like this that gives the internet a bad reputation. This isn't true, we only sort of wish ir were. But if it happened, I would be afraid for our Republic.

Expand full comment
Kim's avatar

Removing a judge, who’s not following the law is not bad for our country it is good for our country . The rule of law. Without it, what are we?

Expand full comment
Lidia Pousada's avatar

Removing a judge occurs via impeachment. That’s a civil matter. It can be done for purely ethical reasons or for crimes committed. You can’t impeach a judge simply because you don’t agree with their rulings.

Imprisonment of a judge only occurs if there’s a subsequent criminal indictment, trial, and conviction.

Judge Boasberg has done nothing more than his job. He ruled as he saw fit and many Americans agree with his judgment.

If the plaintiff or defendant (in this case, the Trump admin) doesn’t agree with the judge’s ruling, the next step is to appeal the ruling.

Appealing a ruling is ALWAYS the next step. Calling for the judge to be impeached or jailed is NEVER appropriate under our system of laws.

Expand full comment
Evan's avatar

ROFLMAO. Really. This judge is guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors. He is way outside the rails of a district court. Abrogating powers he does not have for pure political spite. Absolutely a prime candidate for impeachment!

Expand full comment
Joni Lewandowski's avatar

There’s a reason why we vote in a president and not a judge for the top job. All these judges are, IMO, committing treason, by going up against a president’s decision to deport those that wish to do us harm.

Expand full comment
Ernie Boxall's avatar

A reply from a woman blm called a Rich Privileged White Suburban Racist Woman... A woman who had no problem with her boy Obama arresting mothers, fathers, lawyers, and the PRESIDENT'S friends. Don't forget, for ten years this woman has voted for child sex trafficking and teenage prostitution over obama's open border.

Expand full comment
TheRepublicIsDead's avatar

An impeachment is an investigation by the HOR. Then a trial by the Senate if the HOR finds grounds for removal from office. It is not a criminal trial.

Expand full comment
Lidia Pousada's avatar

The judge is the one upholding the law.

Our laws state that everyone on American soil — citizens, tourists, legal immigrants, illegal immigrants, etc — is entitled to defend themselves in court before being convicted of a crime, being imprisoned, or being deported.

All presidents have deported illegal immigrants and they have followed our laws in so doing.

Obama deported more illegal immigrants than ANY other president and he did so without once breaking the law.

Trump has broken our immigration laws by deporting people without allowing them to defend themselves in court. He’s the one not following the rule of law.

Expand full comment
Kim's avatar

Biden shouldn’t have left so many and known oh well we didn’t have enough people in the courts and furthermore they don’t have to go through the courts very illegal immigrants. They’re not citizens. And the people of this country have a right to expect its government to maintain its borders and maintain the rule of law. You always leave the American citizens out of every single scenario, but you just can’t because it is our home that is being invaded. You have to consider the people they already lived there . My question to you is why don’t you consider the actual citizens of the United States and their rights? What about them?

Expand full comment
Lidia Pousada's avatar

My concern is PRECISELY for American citizens like me and you.

If a president is allowed to deport people without giving them the opportunity to defend themselves in court, then he can deport CITIZENS as well as non-citizens.

Once you eliminate everyone’s Constitutional right to due process (self-defense in court), you explicitly ALLOW deportation of citizens as well as noncitizens and imprisonment of innocent people without a trial. You eliminate the rule of law.

You’re assuming that everyone Trump claims is here illegally have indeed been proven to be illegal immigrants.

But that isn’t true. Albrego Garcia is only one case of a LEGAL immigrant who was illegally deported to a foreign prison without having committed a crime. There are several other, less publicized cases.

Every other president has successfully deported illegal immigrants following our law. Obama deported more illegal immigrants than any other president.

But no president other than Trump has ignored our immigration laws.

If you want more judges, lawyers, and courts available to process immigrants, I’m with you. Let’s make our immigration system efficient and effective. As the richest country in the world, we can easily afford this.

But let’s not let illegal immigration become an excuse for deporting and imprisoning people who live here legally (both citizens and immigrants) and have committed no crimes.

Expand full comment
Kim's avatar

Well, if we’re gonna give the illegal aliens, the rights going out of our country where the hell were my rights when they were coming in . The government doesn’t pay taxes we do. We are the ones picking up the check shouldn’t we have a say?

Expand full comment
Lidia Pousada's avatar

Of course you have a say. You have a vote and you’re free to express your opinions publicly.

Your rights aren’t diminished because someone enters our country illegally. Our laws are very clear — people may not enter illegally.

If they’re caught, they present their case to a judge (usually within a few days) and the judge rules as to whether they meet the criteria for asylum.

If they don’t meet the criteria, they’re immediately deported to their country of origin.

This is the same system we’ve always followed.

The weak link in the chain is that we chronically underfund our system and there aren’t enough judges to rule on each case.

As a result, we end up housing the arrested immigrants for weeks or months awaiting a hearing before a judge.

It’s far cheaper and more efficient to simply hire more judges.

Almost 40% of illegal immigrants are visa overstays, because our underfunded system doesn’t keep track of them.

Visa overstays generally have been in the US for 10 years or more. They’re gainfully employed and they pay payroll taxes, even though they’ll never get any benefits like Social Security, Medicare, or Medicaid.

They also pay sales taxes and property taxes. They contribute a great deal to our economy and get nothing in return unless they become citizens.

Solving the problem of visa overstays also requires funding the immigration service to modernize their computer systems.

If we can put astronauts on the moon, we should be able to track visa holders.

Neither the GOP nor the Dems have passed any significant immigration reform bill since 1960s.

Biden championed a comprehensive bill that was introduced by a Republican to better fund the immigration service and make it efficient.

It passed the Senate but Trump (who was running for re-election) told Speaker Johnson to quash it in the House because Trump needed to condemn our immigration system during his campaign.

Why hasn’t Trump re-introduced that bill now that he’s president? That’s a very good question.

Expand full comment
Marianne S's avatar

We have immigration laws that should have been followed. Not open door policy. Every criminal was sent here. And they don’t belong here. They could get a date for a hearing & go back home until the hearing. People came here to build this country. Why are my taxes supporting them? My family came here & received nothing.

Anything Trump does pisses you crazies off. Obama, Clinton & Bush did the same thing. I don’t recall hearings. When did they take place?

Trump does it & you all lose it.

Expand full comment
Evan's avatar

ROFLMAO. You picked the wrong example to illustrate your point. Garcia has had a surfeit of due process (17 appearances) and was just trying to further play the system.

Expand full comment
Victoria High's avatar

Were you panties in a was when Obummer and Clinton deported illegals? Probably not. You people have a double standard.

Expand full comment
Marianne S's avatar

They don’t tell you about any hearings Obama had. He didn’t. He’s a snake & they believe his BS!

Expand full comment
James Barrett's avatar

You’re right about Obama having deported more illegals than any other President. You’re wrong about not breaking the law. He most certainly did (where were all these activists when that was happening? 🤔)

Expand full comment
Evan's avatar

Most immigration cases do not require, and traditionally do not receive, judicial involvement. The exceptions are where there has been some prior permission to be in the country temporarily, or as a final step after serving time for criminal behavior, if the deported requests it.

Expand full comment
TheRepublicIsDead's avatar

Let's do some math; Obama was in office for 2,922 days. 3,000,000/2,922=1,026 illegals a day.

Are you sure all those illegals got their day in court, or did his regime just start sending back groups of border busters caught near the border and counting them as "deportations"? Hmm...

Expand full comment
Pacificdeb's avatar

Well Biden flagrantly broke the law by opening the borders. It has to be fixed and it can’t be everyone gets a trial. Besides- I think they can’t seek relief because of doctrine of clean hands rule of courts. You void asking the courts for help when you break the law. You have no relief when you disregard the law. Which they did.

Expand full comment
Wahl's avatar

Careful ! The supreme court’s raison d’être is verifying the law is constitutional

Expand full comment
Lidia Pousada's avatar

That’s true. But the only way our democracy can be destroyed by the executive is if both the legislative and judicial branches are either hopelessly weak or utterly corrupt.

Our GOP-majority Congress is clearly both weak and corrupt. But our judiciary has proven to be strong, regardless of whether judges are liberal or conservative.

And the Supreme Court, despite several highly corrupt Justices, hasn’t been completely subservient to Trump and the extreme right. Thus far, SCOTUS has only partially advanced the 2025 Report agenda.

While SCOTUS could and should check all executive overreach, the majority of current Justices appear unwilling to give up their power or allow the executive to become an unfettered dictatorship.

We, the people, have to exert maximal pressure on both Congress and SCOTUS to make it clear Americans don’t believe in a dictatorial executive.

Expand full comment
Deborah Schlichting's avatar

Why? If there were an intelligence jacket on this judge, why would you have concern for our republic? I’m not saying it’s true or not but by allowing these judges to continue to block their deportation, wouldn’t that be an act of terrorism because the illegal alien has first and foremost broken our border laws. It’s against the law to enter our country illegally, is it not? They aren’t entitled to due process because of this alone. Trump designated these gang members as terrorists and aiding and abetting a terrorist makes you guilty of violating this law and therefore making him a terrorist himself, correct?

Let’s say I knew about a plan to commit a murder and said or did nothing to stop it makes me guilty of being a co-conspirator and therefore I would be charged and prosecuted for it.

These judges know they don’t have any legal authority to tell this administration to bring the criminals back home. This isn’t their home. Should they commit a crime once they are returned and most likely will be released on their or. Should they murder an American, wouldn’t this judge be complicit? Just wondering.

Expand full comment
Ann Pettus's avatar

It's just that it didn't really happen. It's fake news

Expand full comment
Devi's avatar

Hopefully it is like a similar publication, “Before It’s News” and it might become news.

Expand full comment
George's avatar

Dated MARCH 20,2025 ....

Expand full comment
Senior K's avatar

I agree with your argument, but you missed the very important part of the original piece. "Military white hats, or MP's made the arrest." They have no business arresting anyone, let alone a judge or congressman, unless we have been invaded and are at war, or maybe if a nation wide Marshall law has been declared, short of that use of the military is illegal and very dangerous.

Expand full comment
Randje's avatar

We ARE at war with globalists financing saboteurs in our justice system, and we HAVE been invaded, Rip Van Winkle, by murderers and rapists that this dirtbag is protecting.

Expand full comment
Jeanne's avatar

Trump said he is a wartime president. He’s said it several times which means we are under military control and Trump is the CaC of the military. I’m not saying this post is true and accurate, I never trust an article that uses an unnamed source.

Expand full comment
Marianne S's avatar

You have the military spraying our country with chemtrails. Why the military? Because we are lied to at every level. All our lives. Turn off the boob tube, MKUtra, CIA talking points on EVERY NEWS STATION! Just listen and you’ll hear & repeat the word of the week.

PROPAGANDA NEWS! THATS WHST WE GET DAILY!

Expand full comment
Liberal Soup N Crackers®'s avatar

Because the post is a fucking lie.

Expand full comment
Lidia Pousada's avatar

Your assumptions are incorrect. EVERYONE on American soil has a right to due process. It’s one of the founding principles of our rule of law.

Regardless of what crimes you have been accused of, EVERYONE in the US is considered innocent until proven guilty.

Why? Because it’s not enough to claim someone is here illegally — you have to prove it before you can deport them.

It’s not enough to allege someone committed a crime — you have to prove it in a court of law where the accused have the right to defend themselves.

The judges blocking Trump’s deportations aren’t opposed to deportation.

The judges are objecting appropriately to Trump ignoring our laws requiring proof that immigrants are here illegally.

Our laws provide the right to a speedy trial and many immigration cases are settled in a few hours.

No other president has had any difficulty following our immigration laws. And every modern president — Clinton, Bush, Obama, and Biden — has deported millions of people.

Expand full comment
Lidia Pousada's avatar

Everyone on American soil has the right to present a defense in court before being convicted, imprisoned, or deported. That includes immigrants alleged to be here illegally.

How else could we prove any immigrant was here illegally? In fact, we now know that more than one was here LEGALLY and was wrongfully deported.

Trump broke our immigration laws by deporting people without proof they were here illegally.

Every other president has deported illegal immigrants, with Obama deporting more than any other president . They all did so without breaking our immigration laws.

Expand full comment
arehaul's avatar

No, there hasn’t been anyone who has been wrongfully deported yet and it’s doubtful it will happen.

No not “everyone on American soil “ has any right to a defense in court. The Bill of Rights only applies to lawful citizens or naturalized immigrants, not just any person who sneaks across the border and cries “Olly Olly in free”, or tourists who are foreign nationals.

Claiming Asylum can only be done at preordained border crossings, not just anywhere in the interior of the country.

Certainly illegal “immigrants” deserve due process and all that’s required is an arrangement just like in Traffic Court.

Who are you, where are you from, citizen of???

Step over here. DONE—NEXT!

Expand full comment
Dena's avatar

They consistently print fake news. Don’t waste your time.

Expand full comment
GLAN's avatar

Likewise

Expand full comment
Constance's avatar

Hahaha

Expand full comment
Lidia Pousada's avatar

This is why satirical posts should be labeled as such.

Expand full comment
WKP's avatar

Why? Mainstream fake news prints lies and innuendos daily and no one calls them out.

Expand full comment
Lidia Pousada's avatar

Of course they’re called out. Newspapers and media outlets are ALL constantly called to task for errors in reporting. They frequently print corrections and in cases of serious errors, must defend themselves in court.

It’s an enormous oversimplification to claim that no one holds the media accountable.

Expand full comment
Dean Weitenhagen's avatar

It’s simply a tongue and cheek story to show the hypocrisy of judge B using the same profane and insulting query as JAG was asking for evidence

Expand full comment
Lidia Pousada's avatar

It’s not hypocritical of a judge to insist that people follow our laws, including people who work for the govt.

The post is clearly satire but the American people have been so flooded with political propaganda for the past decade that many no longer recognize the difference between satire and reality.

Expand full comment
Lidia Pousada's avatar

I wondered if the post was satire because it was so clearly filled with false information.

But there is no indication that this is satirical. And many readers would assume it was — just read the comments.

So this isn’t satire — it’s propaganda.

Expand full comment
Rainbow's avatar

You are right. This post is almost two weeks old. If it was true, we would have heard about it my now.

Expand full comment
Elaine F Blackman's avatar

How often did you hear or read that Hunter Biden didn't have a computer with everything on it?

How often have you heard or read that Biden was going all over the world when he couldn't even find his way off a stage?

How often have you seen fake news given as fact when it comes to DNC / Satanists?

Expand full comment
Marianne S's avatar

It’s called propaganda. All the time. Covid was the eye opener! All lies. You are clueless. Propaganda media are your talking points.

Expand full comment
Lidia Pousada's avatar

Your points aren’t valid.

Hunter Biden’s computer actually did NOT have evidence of any crime involving Joe Biden. The only crimes Hunter committed were delayed payment of taxes and failing to acknowledge his addiction when he purchased a gun. These are minor crimes that were known long before his computer was stolen and had already been resolved.

President Biden DID travel all over the world during his presidency. There’s loads of evidence proving that. He was not incapacitated until the final months of his presidency.

And your claim that the Democratic Party is a Satanic cult is simply absurd. There is NO evidence of that, only malicious propaganda, much of it from Russian bots who were attempting to influence our elections.

While every media outlet has a bias and a few have been found guilty in court of lying (Fox News, The National Inquirer), the majority of the news reported in the US is accurate.

Assuming that the MSM is always lying but MAGA propaganda is always telling the truth is simply wrong.

Expand full comment
Davi's avatar

Yeah!

Expand full comment
Rmd36582's avatar

In other news today, Judge Dredd arrested for claiming “ I am the law!”

Expand full comment
John Snow's avatar

Yep, total BS. Think this guy wants to be a fantasy Babylon Bee type player.

Expand full comment
Rich's avatar

That’s interesting, I’m already afraid for our so-called Republic, one that’s apparently ruled by an un-elected judiciary who’s beholden to a cabal of deep-state, power-mad, elites.

Expand full comment
Lidia Pousada's avatar

This entire story is a pack of lies, pure MAGA propaganda.

The only true part is that Boasberg is the judge who ordered the Trump administration not to illegally deport the Venezuelan immigrants that Trump claimed (without proof) were members of the Tren de Aragua gang.

The rest of the story is completely fabricated.

Expand full comment
Marianne S's avatar

Ah and there you go. MAGA! That’s your problem, you hate it. But people like you were fine with a man lost mentally running the country? Who was running the Country? Did you care? As long as it wasn’t Trump😁

Expand full comment
Elaine F Blackman's avatar

Why are you reading it, then? All you probably believe is fake MSM propaganda. You probably even believed L.H. Oswald shot JFK.

Expand full comment
Lidia Pousada's avatar

The MSM isn’t propaganda, although each media outlet is biased to some degree based on who owns it.

There’s a big difference between expressing different opinions about events and flat out lying.

Only Fox News and The National Inquirer have been found guilty in court of reporting blatant lies.

Expand full comment
C R's avatar

Too bad this isn’t true bc this prick deserves it

Expand full comment
Constance's avatar

The Chair

Expand full comment
C R's avatar

This is a fake article someone conjured up, but that does not mean that this leftist prick and his putrid offspring daughter are actively committing treasonous crimes by thinking that black robe gives them the power to overrule the executive branch of government. I would like to see the prick disbarred and jailed but I’ll settle for him getting run over by a bus crossing the street

Expand full comment
Lidia Pousada's avatar

You’re entitled to your opinion, although my opinion is that you’re criticizing this judge for simply doing his job.

Our court system doesn’t exist to rubber stamp govt actions when the govt breaks the law. The judiciary has a responsibility to act as a check and balance on govt overreach.

Expand full comment
Ron Tkacz's avatar

Fact Check said this is false.

Siri doesn’t know about it either.

I am unsubscribing.

Expand full comment
Trish Randall's avatar

This account posts lies all the time

Expand full comment
Days's avatar

How do you put hacks like this on ignore?

Expand full comment
Trish Randall's avatar

Where the note or post is on you feed, don’t click to open it or comment. At the upper right there are 3 pale dots. Click on that, and you can choose mute or block these are partway down a list of 8 or 10 choices)

Expand full comment
Ann Pettus's avatar

"Fair and balanced news... from Israel" is how they describe their lies, err, news.

Expand full comment
Beth Marie Evans's avatar

Saw this in my feed. I know it’s not true. If I am subscribed, I’ll do likewise. Obvious clickbait.

Expand full comment
Jalb's avatar

It sure started an interesting conversation - wonder if he feels the tap of fate on his shoulder…🤔

Expand full comment
Curt Swanson's avatar

Who posts fake news??? More libtards trying to convolute the truth?

Expand full comment
Lidia Pousada's avatar

It’s more likely written by MAGA propagandists.

Expand full comment
Stratum Press's avatar

Fake news like this is pathetic. I'm MAGA, but this goofy fake news stuff should be a banable offense. You're the first person on this platform that I'm blocking.

Expand full comment
Joaquin Kurtz's avatar

C’mon this makes no sense whatsoever to post stupid stuff like this, It’s fairly obvious that it’s not the left that has put idiotic articles like this, this stupidity makes the Common Sense Right who just wants transparency in the media and Government can get it because of stupid stuff like this posted… be better than that, Get Jesus in your life cause lying and deceit like this is playing straight into the Devil’s hands!!!!

Expand full comment
Dr John Watson's avatar

IT IS CRAP LIKE this that ruins any amount of credibility oN this or any other platform. IT IS NOT ENTERTAINMENT IT IS A LIE.

Expand full comment
Helen Theaumont's avatar

Total FAKE NEWS, it’s BULLSHIT!!

Expand full comment
Marguerite's avatar

False information!

Expand full comment
The Postman's avatar

Improved article title: “M.D. Has Much Too Easy Access to Controlled Substances Cabinet”

Expand full comment
Dean's avatar

😂

Expand full comment
Lynn's avatar

I have found, over the past four years, that realrawnews does not tell the truth. The list of people they had put out that supposedly were taken to Gitmo, never happened.

Expand full comment
Geo's avatar

Don’t buy these Posts

Expand full comment
Reelin’ In The Fears's avatar

I like how Substack allows these types of posts. Although completely fabricated it does allow for us to dream big.

Expand full comment
SGARP's avatar

Blocking this fiction writer.

Expand full comment
Michael S's avatar

Is this true? I can’t find any evidence that he has been arrested.

Expand full comment
Lidia Pousada's avatar

No. It’s satire. This is why satire should be labeled as such — too many people think it’s true and miss the point of the satire.

Expand full comment